Why are swords "better" than guns?

[analogZero]

Originally Posted by Vakarak

A sword fight would take no more than a minute comon kids BACK TO ANIME and let this thread BURN

good call here. most sword fights never lasted much longer than a few moves. plus this thread needs a good dose of fire.

[puppetz]

the important thing here is the fact that a gun with a bayonet is the winner here. it has the blade so you can be sneaky but most likely in war you will just wanna blast away at anything that moves because your adrenaline will be pumping so much that you dont have time to think. and dont say that you can think because you don't have special powers you fool. now stop beating this ridiculous belief into your head and go shoot a pistol and tell me how you feel.

[fejknick]

Originally Posted by SteyrAUG

I figured I'd just leave the rest of your posts directed to Russkie for Russkie. Anyway you already know people can't go back in time, so keep that "swords only would have made the world better" crap to yourself. So how do you think we can alter our own future to remove guns? If NATO throws away all their guns I strongly doubt the rest of the world will follow.

Anyway as I've stated before swords have become obsolete on the modern battlefield. Combat blades will still have an important role, but not anywhere near as important as what swords used to be. A sword can still kill a man with a gun if the man with the gun is either really bad with a gun or if the man with the sword can sneak up on the man with the gun. In a case of 1000000 vs 1000000 it's safe to assume that stealth wouldn't be all that easy if possible at all since as mentioned before major battles with swords have had a history of always being 2 large armies running at each other.

Like i said in my last post, i'm leaving this alone since we think the same thing but are talking about 2 reflections of the same image.

But that post is well put. Not like the other thing you posted. And i didn't mean that i want to take the guns away, that will never work. And people would be more terrified then because of the lack of weapons, we have been taught that weapons is good. But you did put it well in that post. :)

[analogZero]

Originally Posted by puppetz

the important thing here is the fact that a gun with a bayonet is the winner here. it has the blade so you can be sneaky but most likely in war you will just wanna blast away at anything that moves because your adrenaline will be pumping so much that you dont have time to think. and dont say that you can think because you don't have special powers you fool. now stop beating this ridiculous belief into your head and go shoot a pistol and tell me how you feel.

what about a gun that shoots knives! solution? you're damn right it is.

[fejknick]

Originally Posted by analogZero

what about a gun that shoots knives! solution? you're damn right it is.

The chainsawgun from gears of war would win.

[SteyrAUG]

Originally Posted by fejknick

The chainsawgun from gears of war would win.

http://zombiehunters.org/forum/viewt...st=0&sk=t&sd=a
Did someone mention chainsaws and guns?

[fejknick]

Originally Posted by SteyrAUG

http://zombiehunters.org/forum/viewt...st=0&sk=t&sd=a
Did someone mention chainsaws and guns?

WOW, they do exist. :O
Thats insane. I hope there not using that against humans.

[SteyrAUG]

For a realistic weapon I think it would be a bit heavy for my liking, but for a novelty items I'd love it. :D:D:D

[puppetz]

a gun that shoots knives is cool so is a gun that has a chainsaw. now what about a gun that shoots chainsaws?

[fejknick]

Originally Posted by puppetz

a gun that shoots knives is cool so is a gun that has a chainsaw. now what about a gun that shoots chainsaws?

That would be...nasty.