rock v.s. pop

[Memorix]

Originally Posted by suigintou

Oh come on now, that's a really unfair portrayal of pop. You could at least mention the four Liverpool boys. Pop in the 60s was usually better than rock in the 60s, after all.

And btw David Gilmour can't run Pink Floyd to save his life. :D

It depends on what Pop and Rock groups you are comparing. And Gilmour was still a fantastic guitarist whether or not he could hold Floyd together or not. That's all that matters.

[suigintou]

No, that's not all that matters. You can't only look at the guy's positive sides when worshipping him. You should at least admit that he can't run the band for shit, nor can he write a good song without Waters around, clearly. Even "Learning to Fly" sounds like a different band covering Pink Floyd, and not all that well.

[Koopaking]

Hard to compare between a genre with songs about pebbles and stones (rock), and a genre with songs about fizzy drinks (pop) isn't it?

[Bobadoe]

Originally Posted by Koopaking

Hard to compare between a genre with songs about pebbles and stones (rock), and a genre with songs about fizzy drinks (pop) isn't it?

..... Why in the hell can't I think of gold like this?

Wait.... Oh yeah, it is because I'm an idiot... That's it...

[DjKuato]

rock is better then pop no doubt about it