death sentance

gunslinger · 08-04-2009

is the death sentance a good thing or a bad thing.

i say good saves money and im sure the family of the person he killed isnt really careing too much for him and bullet cost about 70 cents for him to stay in jail hmm around 50gs or even 100. i say kill the scum.

quietchat · 08-05-2009

First off, the firing squad hasn't been used for over 70 years, probably longer than that even. It doesn't cost a bullet.

The death sentence now adays is by injecting a prisoner with chemicals to stop the heart and breathing. And what the hell is the 50gs suppose to mean? (I'm not a good expert)

Second off, WHY is it a good thing? You don't even say if it's good to give it to every person that ends up in jail or if there is a certain condition that someone should be given the death sentence.

Third, you don't consider at all the family of the person that would be given the death penalty.

Get your opinion straightened out, otherwise nobody's going to give you a serious answer.

gunslinger · 08-05-2009

First off, the firing squad hasn't been used for over 70 years, probably longer than that even. It doesn't cost a bullet. are you sure? ive seen a video for it happening and it was around 2 years ago or 5 not sure they had a traget on the person sentanced to death so the fireteam wouldnt know the face.

The death sentence now adays is by injecting a prisoner with chemicals to stop the heart and breathing. And what the hell is the 50gs suppose to mean? (I'm not a good expert) 50 milligrams is based on numbing the body so no pain is felt and makeing the victim unable to move is another part or the does then the last part is too stop the heart. i dont know the percentages

Second off, WHY is it a good thing? You don't even say if it's good to give it to every person that ends up in jail or if there is a certain condition that someone should be given the death sentence.

why its a good thing hmm to kill them before they have a chance to kill another innocent person or child and to save tax dollars benifiting the people who do the right things who contribute to soceity.

minor crimes i would not think it would be right at all and i think you should be able to think what group of criminals im talking about getting the death sentence but ill just tell you rapeist marderers kidnappers arsenist and ppl who beat women ect.

Third, you don't consider at all the family of the person that would be given the death penalty.

if the person is a killer im sure they dont have good familiy connections or rapes children i highly belive there family doesnt want them.

quietchat · 08-05-2009

Quotes help...

But anyway, there is NO jail in the united states that executes by shooting someone (I checked up, there are only 2 that died by that method since the 70's, so it's not common for 40 years instead of my estimate 70)

Millgrams is "mg", not "gs". And milligrams of what?

They are in fucking jail, how the hell do you think they would find a chance to kill someone else? As for the money saved, it's minimal at best.

http://www.metrokc.gov/auditor/2003/...tsFollowup.pdf

You'll need a pdf program to view this, but on page 3 of the actual details to the report (Page 8 if you're taking them all together), it comes up to about 85 million dollars in cost in 2003 on the chart. Folowing the trend, we'll assume the cost today is about 100 million. How much is that? MINOR!!! That's taking into all jails in the U.S, compaired to the trillions of dollars that circulate through the country (Despite the national debt).

Your list of people who you think it's acceptable to kill: By charges, sexual assault, homocide, kidnapping, arson, domestic abuse.

Meaning, you'd kill a large number of people who didn't kill anyone at all. There are murderers that don't get the death sentence, and you want to kill someone who set a fire?? This alone is enough to say that you're out of your mind, considering you only have one thing on that list that directly involves killing another and the courts themselves don't instantly say "You kill someone, the state kills you".

And what about the family of the people who AREN'T killers. And then you go and mention child molestation but you left that out of the group you'd want to kill! So, sexually assualt an adult, death. A child, whatever else.

Again, you REALLY need to re-think this, ALL of this. I'm still not taking you seriously, and you aren't putting out a good argument.

gunslinger · 08-05-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by quietchat

Quotes help...

But anyway, there is NO jail in the united states that executes by shooting someone (I checked up, there are only 2 that died by that method since the 70's, so it's not common for 40 years instead of my estimate 70)

Millgrams is "mg", not "gs". And milligrams of what?

They are in fucking jail, how the hell do you think they would find a chance to kill someone else? As for the money saved, it's minimal at best.

Click to view the PDF

Close

Powered by Highslide JS

You'll need a pdf program to view this, but on page 3 of the actual details to the report (Page 8 if you're taking them all together), it comes up to about 85 million dollars in cost in 2003 on the chart. Folowing the trend, we'll assume the cost today is about 100 million. How much is that? MINOR!!! That's taking into all jails in the U.S, compaired to the trillions of dollars that circulate through the country (Despite the national debt).

Your list of people who you think it's acceptable to kill: By charges, sexual assault, homocide, kidnapping, arson, domestic abuse.

Meaning, you'd kill a large number of people who didn't kill anyone at all. There are murderers that don't get the death sentence, and you want to kill someone who set a fire?? This alone is enough to say that you're out of your mind, considering you only have one thing on that list that directly involves killing another and the courts themselves don't instantly say "You kill someone, the state kills you".

And what about the family of the people who AREN'T killers. And then you go and mention child molestation but you left that out of the group you'd want to kill! So, sexually assualt an adult, death. A child, whatever else.

Again, you REALLY need to re-think this, ALL of this. I'm still not taking you seriously, and you aren't putting out a good argument.

i laugh at the jail health part. jail is mostly made up gangs to represent there gang they use black ink and tatoos the needle used in those tatoos is not clean it has blood from other ppl that might of had aids ect which makes anyone get poked by that neddle infected and they dont even know it.

You kill someone, the state kills you". inless you were self defending your self.

ill take out the domestic abuse for arsonist it would depend if anyone got killed in the fire.

or we can do what the japenese do throw em on a iland and let em live there.

eye for an eye vengeance will be mine.

quietchat · 08-05-2009

You aren't taking this seriously at all, are you?

The money spent on the health of the inmates only counts for actual professional medical attention, not what inmates poke each other with. The state isn't paying for them to tatoo each other with makeshift needles and ink.

And again: Second degree, Third degree homocide: You accidently kill someone on a shooting range. You're in a baseball stadium and killed by a home run ball. You finally say that it doesn't count if it was in self defense, and you don't take about accidental deaths.

Arson is done for the sake of causing property damage most of the time, not for killing someone.

And I don't think the japanese actually do that. Even if they did, they are an island nation anyway. That doesn't work for all of the nations and countries that don't live on an island or around them.

Stray_Pube · 08-06-2009

Im for the Death Sentence. I say kill the bitch! When the individual is proven guilty without a shadow of a doubt, take his ass out back, and shoot him in the head. Then wash your hands and go on about your business. Fuck this system where we send the condemned to prison for years and years when we can save the state millions of dollars and shoot them on the spot. Fuck this justice system.

gunslinger · 08-06-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stray_Wolf

Im for the Death Sentence. I say kill the bitch! When the individual is proven guilty without a shadow of a doubt, take his ass out back, and shoot him in the head. Then wash your hands and go on about your business. Fuck this system where we send the condemned to prison for years and years when we can save the state millions of dollars and shoot them on the spot. Fuck this justice system.

thanks for agreeing