new president

[hsb39]

Originally Posted by Lince

Am I the only one who wasn't surprised when he won? I was saying he was going to win after McCain chose Palin as a running mate.. that just really wasn't the best choice for him.
Again, I wanted Obama to win, so that was OK with me. :P

I think that bad is underexaggerating it. It is one of the most sexist things that I have seen in my life.

[Dolly]

Originally Posted by hsb39

I think that bad is underexaggerating it. It is one of the most sexist things that I have seen in my life.

How was that sexist? Palin is a poor choice for a VP slot, it has nothing to do with her being a woman.

[hsb39]

Originally Posted by Dolly

How was that sexist? Palin is a poor choice for a VP slot, it has nothing to do with her being a woman.

I believe that the main reason that she was chosen was because she is a woman, and had nothing to do with ability, that's why I think that it is sexist.

[Dolly]

Originally Posted by hsb39

I believe that the main reason that she was chosen was because she is a woman, and had nothing to do with ability, that's why I think that it is sexist.

Ah, sorry, that was misleading--I thought you were referring to the statement in your quote.

Still, I doubt it was because she was a woman. I mean, Barack beat Hillary. I think what the McCain campaign was really looking for was "lively and young", it just so happens that women often fit that category--and it also happened that Palin was the definition of that. Obviously, it wasn't the best approach.

[trulias]

win of the obama is good or not ?

i don't think this is a important point.

in my opinion, american citizens have not enoug interest about politics or worlds problems. think about this: have can change a idea whit a tv show ? but it can change, isn't it :)

because of my profession, i can easly say you, in philosophical points, american capitalist system is very similar to the old soviet socialist system. i can't explanin this very well in english. im a geinius only in my own launguage :D .
anyway, american political system is a upgraded copy of Ottomans land system. this means oboma, or clinton or names are not important.
the names explains international changing of usa, and the new strategys of usa's high politic makers and systems.
for exampla, if hilary wons, this meas offensive politics and maybe new "war" or "wars".
because in international reliatins high politic, a "woman" president or prayminister means "war". this is like a hidden language :) . and you can chaek what i say. i think very little number of yours are already interested or now, but you can read about englishs "iron layd" or indians "gundi" or pakistans "butto".
and if you want to understand "how american high politic systems works", i recommend to you tom clancys book :)
imagien a world of, full of metarialism and realism :)

with short words, won of the obama is not the point.
and be honest, is the problem obamas black skin, or his religion ?
in my opinion, i don't think about obamas belives. yes, the "WASP" are broken. but don't think obama as a Müslüman. no one Müslaman speaking about armenian problem as a genoside.
you can already understand this; this is all about big peoples big interest : politics, in our times, "the game of the devil" :)

[partyprobe]

Whats to tell things change. If you dont like it deal with it.

[Zaraki]

Originally Posted by trulias

win of the obama is good or not ?

i don't think this is a important point.

in my opinion, american citizens have not enoug interest about politics or worlds problems. think about this: have can change a idea whit a tv show ? but it can change, isn't it :)

because of my profession, i can easly say you, in philosophical points, american capitalist system is very similar to the old soviet socialist system. i can't explanin this very well in english. im a geinius only in my own launguage :D .
anyway, american political system is a upgraded copy of Ottomans land system. this means oboma, or clinton or names are not important.
the names explains international changing of usa, and the new strategys of usa's high politic makers and systems.
for exampla, if hilary wons, this meas offensive politics and maybe new "war" or "wars".
because in international reliatins high politic, a "woman" president or prayminister means "war". this is like a hidden language :) . and you can chaek what i say. i think very little number of yours are already interested or now, but you can read about englishs "iron layd" or indians "gundi" or pakistans "butto".
and if you want to understand "how american high politic systems works", i recommend to you tom clancys book :)
imagien a world of, full of metarialism and realism :)

with short words, won of the obama is not the point.
and be honest, is the problem obamas black skin, or his religion ?
in my opinion, i don't think about obamas belives. yes, the "WASP" are broken. but don't think obama as a Müslüman. no one Müslaman speaking about armenian problem as a genoside.
you can already understand this; this is all about big peoples big interest : politics, in our times, "the game of the devil" :)

how can you say the american capitalist system is like the old soviet socialist system? if you could explain it better in english i would love to know. yeah our system isn't a pure capitalist state we do have restrictions and all that to trading but it isn't as strict like the socialist system which has many restrictions.

[Dolly]

Originally Posted by trulias

win of the obama is good or not ?

i don't think this is a important point.

in my opinion, american citizens have not enoug interest about politics or worlds problems. think about this: have can change a idea whit a tv show ? but it can change, isn't it :)

because of my profession, i can easly say you, in philosophical points, american capitalist system is very similar to the old soviet socialist system. i can't explanin this very well in english. im a geinius only in my own launguage :D .
anyway, american political system is a upgraded copy of Ottomans land system. this means oboma, or clinton or names are not important.
the names explains international changing of usa, and the new strategys of usa's high politic makers and systems.
for exampla, if hilary wons, this meas offensive politics and maybe new "war" or "wars".
because in international reliatins high politic, a "woman" president or prayminister means "war". this is like a hidden language :) . and you can chaek what i say. i think very little number of yours are already interested or now, but you can read about englishs "iron layd" or indians "gundi" or pakistans "butto".
and if you want to understand "how american high politic systems works", i recommend to you tom clancys book :)
imagien a world of, full of metarialism and realism :)

with short words, won of the obama is not the point.
and be honest, is the problem obamas black skin, or his religion ?
in my opinion, i don't think about obamas belives. yes, the "WASP" are broken. but don't think obama as a Müslüman. no one Müslaman speaking about armenian problem as a genoside.
you can already understand this; this is all about big peoples big interest : politics, in our times, "the game of the devil" :)

Alright, I have to admit your poor grammar has me at a loss here. But I'll pick some points.

First off, and overall, you need to stop acting like you're a mentor to a bunch of dumb cattle. Americans aren't all as fickle as the stereotype may suggest.

We don't care about politics? Record turnouts show otherwise.

The issue of Obama's religion has long been discarded. These were simple allegations sparked by enemies to make voters doubt.

And trust me, we don't need to read a Clancy book to understand how the politics of our "own country" works.

[trulias]

oookeyyyy ;D
----------------


Zakari, if you honestly ask the same points, i can explanin to you academicly one of mine free time.
see ya :)

[Zaraki]

Originally Posted by trulias

oookeyyyy ;D
----------------


Zakari, if you honestly ask the same points, i can explanin to you academicly one of mine free time.
see ya :)

i'm sorry but was that a burn? my economics teacher back in high school would disagree w/ you.